Thursday 9 December 2010

Article for December 14th.


Operation Payback cripples MasterCard site in revenge for WikiLeaks ban

Hackers attack credit card company and Swedish prosecution authority as 'censorship' row escalates

MasterCard
Operation Payback appears to have orchestrated a DDoS (distributed denial of service) attack on MasterCard. Photograph: AP
The websites of the international credit card MasterCard and the Swedish prosecution authority are among the latest to be taken offline in the escalating technological battle over WikiLeaks, web censorship and perceived political pressure.
Co-ordinated attacks by online activists who support the site and its founder Julian Assange – who is in UK custody accused of raping two Swedish women – have seen the websites of the alleged victims' Swedish lawyer disabled, while commercial and political targets have also been subject to attack by a loose coalition of global hackers.
The Swedish prosecution authority has confirmed its website was attacked last night and this morning. MasterCard was partially paralysed today in revenge for the payment network's decision to cease taking donations to WikiLeaks.
In an attack referred to as Operation Payback, a group of online activists calling themselves Anonymous appear to have orchestrated a DDoS (distributed denial of service) attack on the financial site, bringing its service to a halt.
Attempts to access www.mastercard.com have been unsuccessful since shortly after 9.30am.
The site would say only that it was "experiencing heavy traffic on its external corporate website" but insisted this would not interfere with its ability to process transactions.
But one payment service company told the BBC its customers were experiencing "a complete loss of service" on MasterCard SecureCode. The credit card company later confirmed that loss.
MasterCard tonight said in a statement it was "working to restore normal service levels" after "a concentrated effort to flood our corporate web site with traffic and slow access." The company added: "It is important to note that our systems have not been compromised and there is no impact on our cardholders' ability to use their cards for secure transactions globally."
MasterCard announced on Monday that it would no longer process donations to WikiLeaks, which it claimed was engaged in illegal activity.
Visa, Amazon, Swiss bank PostFinance and others have also announced in recent days that they will cease trading with the whistleblowing site.
The moves have led to concerted attempts by hackers to target companies they deem guilty of "censoring" WikiLeaks.
Operation Payback, which has been targeting commercial sites that have cut their ties with WikiLeaks for some days, has also made threats to other organisations including Twitter, which it says is suppressing the site.
"We will fire at anything or anyone that tries to censor WikiLeaks, including multibillion-dollar companies such as PayPal," a statement circulating online, apparently from Operation Payback, said.
"Twitter, you're next for censoring #WikiLeaks discussion. The major shitstorm has begun," it added.
Twitter has issued a statement denying it has censored the hashtag, and saying confusion had arisen over its "trending" facility.
Meanwhile it has also emerged that Visa has today ordered DataCell, an IT firm that helps WikiLeaks collect payments, to suspend all of its transactions – even those involving other payees – a day after it cut off all the firm's donations being made to WikiLeaks.
DataCell, a small Icelandic company that facilitates transfers made bycredit cards including Visa and MasterCard, says it will take up "immediate legal actions" and warned that the powerful "duopoly" of Visa and MasterCard could spell "the end of the credit card business worldwide".
Andreas Fink, chief executive of DataCell, said in a statement: "Putting all payments on hold for seven days or more is one thing but rejecting all further attempts to donate is making the donations impossible.
"This does clearly create massive financial losses to WikiLeaks, which seems to be the only purpose of this suspension.
"This is not about the brand of Visa; this is about politics, and Visa should not be involved in this.
"Visa customers are contacting us in masses to confirm that they really donate and they are not happy about Visa rejecting them. It is obvious that Visa is under political pressure to close us down."
Earlier, PayPal, which has also been the subject of technological attack since it suspended payments to WikiLeaks last week, appeared to admit that it had taken the step after an intervention from the US state department.
PayPal's vice-president of platform, Osama Bedier, told an internetconference the site had decided to freeze WikiLeaks' account on 4 December after government representatives said it was engaged in illegal activity. "On November 27th, the state department, the US government basically, wrote a letter saying that the WikiLeaks' activities were deemed illegal in the United States and as a result our policy group had to make the decision of suspending the account," Bedier said. He added: "We ... comply with regulations around the world, making sure that we protect our brand."
His remarks will undoubtedly intensify criticism from supporters of WikiLeaks that the site is being targeted for political reasons.
Operation Payback, which refers to itself as "an anonymous, decentralised movement that fights against censorship and copywrong", and has been linked to the influential internet messageboard 4Chan, argues that such steps "are long strides closer to a world where we cannot say what we think and are unable to express our opinions and ideas".
It added: "We cannot let this happen. This is why our intention is to find out who is responsible for this failed attempt at censorship.
"This is why we intend to utilise our resources to raise awareness, attack those against and support those who are helping lead our world to freedom and democracy."
The MasterCard action was confirmed on Twitter at 9.39am by user @Anon_Operation, who later tweeted: "We are glad to tell you that http://www.mastercard.com/ is down and it's confirmed! #ddos #WikiLeaks Operation: Payback (is a bitch!) #PAYBACK"
PostFinance was successfully hacked on Monday after it shut down one of WikiLeaks' key bank accounts, accusing Assange of lying. Its service since has been seriously disrupted.
PayPal has also been targeted a number of times, but while its internal blog was paralysed for more than two hours, the payment processing facility has so far been able to withstand the attacks.
Other cyber attacks were mounted yesterday on EveryDNS.net, which suspended dealings on 3 December, while Amazon, which removed WikiLeaks content from its EC2 cloud on 1 December, may also be a possible target.
According to bloggers monitoring the cyber attacks, those involved in the protests have also been targeting the websites of US senator Joe Lieberman, who is an outspoken critic of WikiLeaks, and Sarah Palin, who said Assange should be treated like a terrorist.
Claes Bergstrom, the lawyer of the two women who claim Assange raped or assaulted them, confirmed his website was shut down overnight, as was the site of a lawyer representing Assange in Sweden. This was the first time such an attack had occurred, he said.
DDoS attacks, which often involve flooding the target site with requests so that it cannot cope with legitimate communication, are illega

Article for December 14th....Subject, Agree or disagree, why? Audio is available, link provided

http://www.npr.org/2010/12/08/131877263/wikileaks-were-i-an-alien?sc=fb&cc=fp


WikiLeaks: Were I An Alien ...

alien
iStockphoto.com
text size A A A
December 8, 2010
Last week WikiLeaks, an organization dedicated to the release of secret documents, made public 250,000 diplomatic cables. These private thoughts of U.S. diplomats are some of the strangest historical documents to come to light in the past decade.
Because of the unusual nature of this "information dump," we thought it would be a good opportunity to take a step back and look at our culture. What do these documents do to our image?
We asked a number of experts what they would think of the U.S. in light of the past week, had they been an alien, looking down, trying to understand the nature of the WikiLeaks release.

P.J. O'Rourke
James Kegley
P.J. O'Rourke
P.J. O'Rourke is the former editor-in-chief of National Lampoon.
Maybe aliens would think:
What amazing lengths the vast right tentacled conspiracy will go to discredit Hillary Clinton.
Or maybe:
Earthlings keep no secrets, so they hate each other! This will destroy Earth... every alien's dream!
Or maybe:
PLANET.HAS.NOT.DISCOVERED.CODES.
OUR.SECRET.MESSAGES.TO.SARAH.PALIN.ARE.SECURE.

Newt Gingrich
Callista Gingrich/Gingrich Productions
Newt Gingrich
Newt Gingrich is a former speaker of the House. He is also the author of over 20 books. 
An alien watching the most powerful nation in the world allowing itself to be humiliated and crippled by a handful of irresponsible, destructive fanatics would consider it an amazing exercise in self-destruction.
A great country allows its own citizens and its allies to be put in danger of being killed and does nothing!
They would be amazed at American impotence and incompetence.

Heather Hurlburt
Courtesy of the National Security Network
Heather Hurlburt
Heather Hurlburt is the executive director of the National Security Network. She is a former speechwriter for President Clinton.
The travel agent promised a cool green planet with growing democracy and rising living standards.
This planet is hot, grumpy and cash-strapped. And their attention is focused on a megalomaniac using stolen documents to tell world leaders that their colleagues are rude, thin-skinned and consort with prostitutes?
What I want to know is, does the refund still apply if we use the space modulator to destroy this planet?

Ahmed Akbar
Courtesy of American University
Akbar Ahmed
Akbar Ahmed is the chair of Islamic studies at American University. 
An alien from outer space would see earthlings as a dysfunctional tribal society.
Their chiefs do not show wisdom, courage or compassion but appear backstabbing and petty.
They attack allies and enemies with the same mean spirit. Classic anthropology describes traditional tribal societies as "ordered anarchy." Tribes are in a state of constant warfare but they are bound by rules and codes of behavior that emphasize honor and dignity.
In contrast, 21st century Earth is "disordered anarchy."

Eboo Patel
Courtesy of Eboo Patel
Eboo Patel
Eboo Patel is founder and president of Interfaith Youth Core, a nonprofit organization that promotes interfaith cooperation.
On my planet, secret documents are meant to hide bad behavior. But some people on this planet have discovered that the revelations by WikiLeaks have made them respect their diplomats more, not less.
The behind-closed-doors acts of at least some of your government officials seem to be more impressive than their public conduct.
I wonder if this is true of your citizens at large?
Perhaps the man honking angrily in traffic is caring for an elderly aunt at home. Maybe the woman cutting in line at a food court is helping her neighbor's sick child.
Americans complain about the coarsening of public discourse. Perhaps the solution is imagining the essential decency of your citizen's private lives, and revealing the secrets of that decency to all.   

Nicholas Christakis
Jordan Makarof
Nicholas Christakis
Nicholas Christakis is an internist, social scientist and professor of medical sociology at Harvard Medical School. He conducts research on social factors that affect health, health care and longevity.
Many people are focused on what seems like the large volume of material released, but from my perspective, this material is only a small fraction of what is of interest.
Trying to understand diplomatic communications by this set of leaked materials is like trying to understand the American telecommunications network by looking at your own phone bill.
One set of cables from many far-flung diplomats sent back to one capital is not indicative of what would really interest me about all this: namely, how communications fly through the network of diplomats around the world, what the communications really mean, and how they affect foreign policy and therefore the lives of all of us.

Elizabeth Dickinson
Courtesy of Elizabeth Dickinson
Elizabeth Dickinson
Elizabeth Dickinson is assistant managing editor at Foreign Policy magazine. She has also worked in West Africa as Nigeria correspondent for The Economist.
If I were perched in a space capsule looking down on Earth these past few days, I'd be pretty excited. Because with the awe and excitement with which these Americans are reading the secret cables —
A Dagestani wedding! A bank robbery in Yemen! A Batman and Robin duo leading Russia! —
I'd come to realize — how incredible! These "Americans" are just as alien outside their borders as we are!

Jean Lesieur
Courtesy of France 24
Jean Lesieur
Jean Lesieur is the editorial director of France 24.
They pretend to be rational. They tend to become spaced-out. Humans love democracy, so they say. They discover transparency.
WikiLeaks?
Wicked freaks.
No more secrets, no more taboos. Statesmen that they choose, heroes that they lose. They transform them into liars and hypocrites.
Humans? Mutants.
From self-loving to self-loathing. From self promotion to self destruction.

Jay Nordlinger
Amr M. Moursi
Jay Nordlinger
Jay Nordlinger is a senior editor of National Review.
An alien would see that we're a very loose culture. Just a few people, exercising their own judgment, can cause a big stir.
One person with access to secrets can take those secrets and pass them along. A handful of people, some of whom may work at the most important newspapers, can spread that information all over the world. In an instant.
Now, that information may be so sensitive that it's life-endangering. But that tiny number of people will decide whether to spread it, regardless of what others may think, regardless of what democratically constituted governments may think.
That's a little weird.
These guys must think a lot of their own judgment. Given how much is at stake, their judgment had better be good.