Sunday 14 October 2012

Article for Discussion, October 16th


Megacities pose serious health challenge

Researchers call for stringent air-quality control during rapid urbanization.
Can tigher regulation lift Beijing's thick smog?
GETTY IMAGES
Rapid urbanization will take a heavy toll on public health if city planning and development do not incorporate measures to tackle air pollution, warns a report launched in Beijing last month. 
The report1, compiled by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) in Geneva, Switzerland, and the International Global Atmospheric Chemistry (IGAC) project in Boulder, Colorado, was launched as part of the IGAC Open Science Conference on Atmospheric Chemistry in the Anthropocene. A striking point in the report, says Liisa Jalkanen, head of the WMO’s Atmospheric Environment Research Division, is how quickly megacities — metropolitan areas with populations of more than 10 million — are rising in developing countries.
There are now 23 megacities in the world, compared with just two 60 years ago. Just over half of the population currently dwells in cities, and with the urban population expected to nearly double by 2050, that proportion is projected to approach 70%. “Almost all this growth will take place in the developing world,” says Jalkanen.

“But many cities in developing countries are expanding rapidly with poor planning and few pollution-reduction measures,” says Zhu Tong, an atmospheric scientist at Peking University in Beijing. “This is having serious consequences on the environment and public health.”Megacities “have better job and education opportunities, and well-planned, densely populated areas can reduce land conversion and use energy more efficiently”, says Luisa Molina, president of the Molina Center for Strategic Studies in Energy and Environment in La Jolla, California.
Asia, for instance, has more than half of the world’s most-polluted cities, and air pollution contributes to half a million deaths each year in the region, according to a recent report by the Asian Development Bank2. More than two-thirds of Asian cities — compared with just one-fifth in the rest of the world — fail to meet the European Union’s air-quality standard for particulate pollutants.
“Part of the problem is the pace of development,” says Zhu. The population of city dwellers in China has risen almost five-fold since 1950, sending energy consumption skyrocketing and putting millions of cars on the roads, contributing to pollution hot-spots such as the notorious ‘Beijing smog’.
Levels of the air pollutants responsible for respiratory and heart diseases are high and rising in Beijing. Ground-level ozone concentrations have risen six-fold in the past three decades, with current levels typically twice the standard set by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), according to David Parrish, an atmospheric scientist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in Boulder, Colorado.
The concentrations of PM2.5 — airborne particles 2.5 micrometres or less in diameter — typically range between 100 and 150 micrograms per cubic metre of Beijing's air, which is six to ten times higher than the EPA standard. “The health impact can be enormous,” says Andre Nel, an environmental scientist at the University of California, Los Angeles. By one estimate, mortality increases by 1% for every 10-microgram-per-cubic-metre increase of PM2.5 in big cities, he says.
In February, China’s State Council introduced legislation aimed at curbing ozone and PM2.5 levels, as well as other emissions. The standards, which must be implemented by 2016, are similar to, or in some cases higher than, their counterparts in the United States and the European Union. The move follows regulations introduced in 1996 that helped to significantly reduce emissions such as sulphur dioxide and carbon monoxide by adopting vehicle-emission standards and promoting the use of natural gas and low-sulphur coal, says Shao Min, an atmospheric scientist at Peking University.
"To meet these new standards, especially for ozone and PM2.5, a strategic shift in pollution-reduction measures will be required," says Shao. Unlike sulphuric dioxide and carbon monoxide, which are directly emitted by their sources, ozone and PM2.5 are secondary pollutants that are formed by chemical reactions between a range of different precursors in the atmosphere. “This means we should cast our net much wider rather than focusing on just a few precursors,” says Shao.
Beijing has the most stringent emission controls in China, but a significant fraction of its pollutants come from surrounding regions, says Zhu. During the 2008 Beijing Olympics, for instance, air masses from the south could contribute to 34-88% of peak ozone concentrations in the city. “Beijing’s air quality will not be significantly improved unless the current measures are able to break administrative boundaries,” says Zhu. 
Beijing’s approach should be applied in other large cities in the developing world, researchers said at the conference. Otherwise, “megacities will become a main source of global pollution”, says Molina. “How governments meet the challenges of rapid urbanization will determine the quality of life in the future.” 

Article for discussion, October 16th


Controversy, Record Entries, French Frontrunners As Oscar’s 2012 Foreign Language Race Kicks Off Tonight

By PETE HAMMOND Friday October 12, 2012 @ 12:58pm PDT

The Foreign Language Film race for the 85th Annual Academy Awards kicks into high gear tonight at the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Science’s Samuel Goldwyn Theatre with a double feature. Denmark’s  period costume drama, A Royal Affair will be followed by the Dominican Republic entry Jaque Mate, the first two of a record 71 entries (up from 63 in 2011) for this year’s competition. Is it good or bad to be first? Last year two films, Footnote and A Separation screened over the first weekend and both got nominated, with the latter actually winning.
Three committees divided into sections of Red, White and Blue (appropriate for an election year doncha think?) will each view a third of the entries with the White group seeing 23 and the other two each viewing 24 films. Other opening round entries are Norway’s Kon-Tiki and Slovak Republic’s Made In Ash showing Saturday morning and China’s Caught In The Web and Slovenia’s A Trip screening Monday night. In previous years there was a fourth Green committee but because of a time crunch the films are now being spread among just the three groups viewing more films. Committee members (which can number into the hundreds) must see a set minimum of their group’s titles in order to have votes count. Their six highest scoring movies move on to the semi-finals together with three others chosen by the small Foreign Language Executive Committee (usually “saves” of higher profile or more controversial entries the larger, generally more conservative volunteer committee failed to advance). Those nine films will be seen the weekend before the final five Foreign Language choices are announced with the other Academy Award nominations  on January 10th.
This year the schedule is tighter with Oscar noms coming two weeks earlier than usual. In order to complete the daunting Foreign Language screening process the initial screening program of all 71 films which in the past has spread out into mid-January (with a Christmas break) will now be completed on December 17, the same day Oscar nomination ballots are mailed for other categories.
The record total could have been even higher had several fairly high profile films from such Middle Eastern countries as Lebanon, Egypt and Saudi Arabia been entered but there is no participation from any of those countries this year in addition to Iran which publicly stated it was withholding the acclaimed A Cube Of Sugar as a protest over the anti-Islam video that made waves in the region recently. Iran actually won its first Oscar last year with A Separation so its absence is just more indication that politics has crept into the Academy’s foreign language process more than ever before. Egypt and Lebanon also competed last year.
It was for instance a tricky situation for Lebanese director  Ziad Doueiri whose powerful drama, The Attack was shown at Telluride and Toronto to acclaim  last month. The film about a Palestinian citizen of Israel whose wife turns out to be a suicide bomber ultimately apparently proved too much of a hot potato for Lebanon to enter even though the filmmaker, after sensitive negotiations, had assured me in Toronto that the Lebanese officials in charge of the process had greenlit the entry. That obviously changed since that conversation and Lebanon is sitting out the Oscar contest this year. Cohen Media has the film for U.S distribution.
Sony Pictures Classics picked up Saudi Arabia’s Wadjda for release next year but this terrific film, the first ever from the country directed by a woman, Haifaa Al Mansour, did not meet some of the Academy’s stringent requirements for exhibition in the home country (there aren’t movie theatres there but it can be seen on DVD).  Egypt’s After The Battle was actually a Cannes Film Festival competition entry in May but its controversial political content dealing with the recent revolution probably ran into roadblocks on the way to the Oscars. It’s not a great film but in a less toxic environment still might have gotten out of Egypt and over to Wilshire Boulevard. I have said many times this aspect of the entry process for the Foreign Language Oscar (leaving the decision  up to individual countries which frequently have political agendas and use the Oscars to promote them) is often compromised, and ripe for a complete overhaul if the Academy is really serious about honoring what are really the best and most significant efforts in international cinema.
Among those films that are in the competition there seems to be a widespread feeling among pundits that this is France’s race to lose. The country entered its mega-hit, The Intouchables which is the most successful international import from France ever, earning a remarkable $365 million worldwide and counting. That dwarfs any other film in the race, box office wise at least. As Deadline scooped earlier this week it is also the first DVD screener sent to all Academy members this year as domestic distributor The Weinstein Company plans to campaign it across the board including Best Picture further strengthening its profile. It’s a real crowd pleaser and should, if past tastes are any indication, be right up the committee’s alley. Oddly it has one of the worst slots in the lineup following Malaysia’s  Bunohan as the second half of a double bill on Halloween, Wednesday October 31. Of course it has been playing non-stop in U.S. theaters since May so it probably won’t have a problem being seen.
On top of that French triumph there is the Austrian entry, Amour which won the Palme d’Or at Cannes and stars French icons Jean Louis Trintignant, Emmanuelle Riva and Isabelle Huppert. It is French in every way except its director Michael Haneke is from Austria. The nationality of the helmer takes precedence most often in determining which country enters films, even if not in the director’s native language. So does it come down to a Gallic battle between Intouchables  and Amour as current odds indicate, or are there other gems awaiting the committee? You bet.
Tonight’s opener A Royal Affair, which played Telluride and Toronto, is a first rate and very classy period piece starring Mads Mikkelsen that should have great Academy appeal given their penchant in the past for costume dramas. Perennial contenders Italy and Spain both have strong entries this year too. Italy’s Caesar Must Die from the great Taviani brothers is about a performance of Julius Caesar in a high-security Roman prison and also may benefit from being one of the shortest entries at only 76 minutes. When you are dealing with seeing 71 films brevity can count. And if short running times help, watch out for Lithuania this year. Its entry, Ramin is one of the shortest in memory clocking in at only  58 minutes. Spain’s  Blancanieves is another black and white homage to silent films and could benefit from leftover goodwill and feelings about last year’s big Best Picture winner, The Artist. The Cohen Media Group just announced today it will release the film domestically.
Among others, China’s Kaige Chen makes his entry, Caught In The Web a must-see. There’s the crafty political drama, No about a corrupt election in Chile starring Gael Garcia Bernal that has been a hit on the festival circuit since winning Director’s Fortnight in Cannes. It’s a contender for sure and will be released by Sony Pictures Classics. Switzerland’s Sister has drawn praise from many observers along with the Philippines entry, Bwakaw, recently singled out by Time Magazine as one of the key must-sees at the currently running New York Film Festival. Canada’s WarWitch, Norway’s Kon Tiki, Romania’s Cannes winner Beyond The Hills (the longest film in the competition at 152 minutes and showing as a single feature on December 8th), Bosnia and Herzegovina’s Children Of Sarajevo, Australia’s Lore, Afghanistan’s The Patience Stone, Germany’s very fine Barbara (which I caught in Telluride), South Korea’s Pieta, Sweden’s The Hypnotist, India’s Barfi!, Iceland’s The Deep and Israel’s Fill The Void (another SPC pickup) are other hightly touted titles. But there is much more for film lovers to choose from beyond those and despite the French edge at the starting gun this could turn into a real race with one of the most promising lineups in years.

http://www.deadline.com/2012/10/controversy-oscars-2012-foreign-language-race/

Article for discussion - October 16th


Nobel Peace Prize awarded to European Union


The European Union has been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for six decades of work in advancing peace in Europe.
The committee said the EU had helped to transform Europe "from a continent of war to a continent of peace".
The award comes as the EU faces the biggest crisis of its history, with recession and social unrest rocking many of its member states.
The last organisation to be given the prize outright was Medecins Sans Frontieres, which won in 1999.
Announcing the award, Nobel committee president Thorbjoern Jagland acknowledged the EU's current financial problems and social unrest.
But he said the committee wanted to concentrate on the EU's work over six decades of advancing "peace and reconciliation, democracy and human rights".
'Biggest peacemaker'
Mr Jagland highlighted the EU's work in sealing the reconciliation between France and Germany in the decades after World War II and praised the organisation for incorporating Spain, Portugal and Greece after their authoritarian regimes collapsed in the 1970s.
The EU's reconciliation work had now moved to Balkan countries, he said, pointing out that Croatia is on the verge of membership.
And he added that the possibility of EU membership for Turkey had also "advanced democracy and human rights in that country".
Senior EU figures were overjoyed with the award.
EU Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso called it a "great honour", while European Council President Herman Van Rompuy said it was recognition for the work of "the biggest peacemaker in history".
In an interview with the BBC, Mr Barroso said that in awarding the prize to the EU, the Nobel Committee was saying that the European project should be cherished, both within and beyond Europe.
"I believe it is justified for the European Union to see its work for peace recognised, not only in the unification of the continent, but also outside our Europe," he said.
"This started after the war - putting together former enemies. It started with six countries and we are now 27, another one is going to join us next year and more want to come. So the EU is the most important project for peace in terms of transnational, supernational co-operation."
German Chancellor Angela Merkel said she regarded the Nobel as a "personal incentive" to build on six decades of peace in Europe.
"We must never forget that in order to keep this peace, democracy and freedom, we have to work hard over and over again," she said.
French President Francois Hollande said the EU needed to show it was "worthy" of the award. "We are honoured, we are proud and at the same time we have our responsibilities before us," he told journalists during a visit to Senegal.
The BBC's Europe correspondent Matthew Price says the EU's achievements are clear, but the committee has picked a strange time to highlight them.
The eurozone crisis has made the EU look more divided and fragile than it has for decades, he says.
EU 'like Yugoslavia'
Alongside the chorus of praise, several eurosceptic politicians were quick to deride the award.
Nigel Farage of the UK Independence Party (UKIP) likened the EU project to the former Yugoslavia.
"Rather than bring peace and harmony, the EU will cause insurgency and violence," he said.
Dutch eurosceptic Geert Wilders questioned the timing of the award.
"A Nobel prize for the EU at a time Brussels and all of Europe is collapsing in misery. What next? An Oscar for Van Rompuy," he said.
The Nobel committee has rarely shied away from controversy with its choice of winner.
US President Barack Obama won the award in 2009 despite leading a country that was fighting two separate wars.
And the choice of detained Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo in 2010 enraged China, which made an official complaint to Norway.
This year's Nobel Prize for literature winner, Chinese writer Mo Yan, said on Friday he hoped Mr Liu would be freed as soon as possible.