Saturday 18 June 2011

Article for June 21st

The Dangers of Fracking

Written by Edie Kantrowitz on 13 April 2011.
Hydraulic Fracturing, or “fracking,” continues to be one of the most serious challenges facing our environment today. In order to extract natural methane gas for an “alternative” source of energy, hundreds of chemicals, many of which are toxic, neurotoxic, or even carcinogenic, are injected into the ground to fracture rock and release methane. Not only do many of these chemicals then leak into surrounding lands, streams, aquifers and wells, but the vast amounts of wastewater created by the process are also highly toxic, and contaminate whatever they come in contact with, especially as adequate wastewater disposal is not always available.
The industry has attempted to keep the identity of these chemicals secret or “proprietary,” making it difficult for individuals suffering health effects to even know exactly to which chemicals they have been exposed. It has been learned that in some instances, diesel has been used, although specifically prohibited. The large number of wells drilled has in other states already turned landscapes into an industrial wasteland, created air pollution, and had a devastating result for wildlife. While the gas industry claims that wastewater will be “recycled” to use again in the fracking process, this is not a real solution to the wastewater problem because the water becomes even more toxic if it used to frack repeatedly, and disposal of this contaminated water is still required.
The effects of fracking have been repeatedly documented, for example, in the powerful motion picture “Gaslands” by Josh Fox, which was recently nominated for an Academy Award. On February 27, 2011, an article in the New York Times revealed that radioactive radon gas released by the fracking process has created a problem with radioactive wastewater disposal in Pennsylvania, where many wells have been drilled to frack the “Marcellus Shale” formation, and stated that radioactive wastewater has been discharged into the Monangahela River, from which comes Pittsbughʼs drinking water supply. In some instances, wastewater from fracked wells has been found to have radioactivity over 1,000 times in excess of permissible standards.
It has been difficult to regulate fracking in part because, amazingly, the hydraulic fracturing industry in 2005 was exempted from compliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) and several other environmental laws. This exemption is known as the “Halliburton loophole” because it was added to these laws by former Vice President Dick Cheney, who has strong ties to Halliburton.
Now this dangerous practice of fracking is coming to a watershed near you, and it must be stopped! Plans are underway for fracking in both the Delaware River basin, and upstate New York. Former Governor Paterson signed a moratorium on fracking in New York State, but it lasts only until July 1, 2011. The Delaware River Basin Commission (DRBC) has issued draft regulations that would permit fracking in the basin, including watershed areas that affect the drinking water supplies for both New York and Philadelphia. DRBC has held only three public hearings on these regulations, none of which were in New York or Philadelphia, and attempts have been made to get DRBC to schedule more hearings. The DRBC is, however, accepting public comments on the regulations until April 15, 2011, so it is extremely important that you contact them and voice your concerns. The New York City Council Committee on the Environment also held a public hearing on fracking on March 1, 2011, followed by an activist rally, which will be the first of many demanding that fracking be banned.
Additionally, three New York State congressional representatives have now called upon congress to hold its own hearings on the impacts of fracking.
TO LEARN MORE AND TAKE ACTION
Please visit the following websites:

Friday 17 June 2011

Article for June 21st

MP says minimum wage a hindrance to disabled jobseekers

Philip Davies explains why he thinks the minimum wage can hold back disabled people
A Conservative MP has suggested "vulnerable" jobseekers - including disabled people - should be allowed to work for less than the minimum wage.
Backbencher Philip Davies said the £5.93-an-hour legal minimum may be a "hindrance" to some jobseekers.
Firms were likely to favour other candidates and MPs should not "stand in the way" of those who wanted to work for less to get on the "jobs ladder".
But mental health charity Mind said it was a "preposterous suggestion".
Mr Davies, the MP for Shipley, made the comments during a debate in the Commons over the minimum wage and employment opportunities.
The minimum wage is currently £5.93 an hour for those over 21, £4.92 for those aged between 18 and 20 and £3.64 for 16 and 17 year olds.
'Less of a risk' The MP claimed the most vulnerable, including those with learning disabilities and mental health problems, were disadvantaged in their search for work because they had to compete with candidates without disabilities and could not offer to accept lower pay.
They were desperate to work but continually found the "door was being closed in their face".
He said he had talked to people with mental health problems during a visit to a surgery run by the charity Mind, and they had "accepted" that they would be passed over in favour of jobseekers without disabilities.

“Start Quote

It would set the cause of equality for disabled people back sometime to the middle of the last century”
Dame Anne Begg Labour MP
"Given some of those people with a learning disability clearly, by definition, cannot be as productive in their work as somebody who has not got a disability of that nature, then it was inevitable given the employer was going to have to pay them both the same they were going to take on the person who was going to be more productive, less of a risk," he said.
He continued: "My view is that for some people, the national minimum wage may be more of a hindrance than a help.
"If those people who consider it is being a hindrance to them, and in my view that's some of the most vulnerable people in society, if they feel that for a short period of time, taking a lower rate of pay to help them get on their first rung of the jobs ladder, if they judge that that is a good thing, I don't see why we should be standing in their way."
Mr Davies was challenged over his remarks by fellow Tory MP Edward Leigh who told him: "Forget the fact there is a minimum wage for a moment. Why actually should a disabled person work for less than £5.93 an hour. It is not a lot of money, is it?"
Mr Davies replied that, irrespective of whether it was "right or wrong", that was "just the real world that we operate in".
He later told the BBC Radio 4's PM that the minimum wage had benefited a lot of people and he was not suggesting that vulnerable people should work for less than the legal minimum.
But he believed they should have the opportunity to do so, should they wish, for a short term to ensure they had time in the workplace "to prove themselves".
'Preposterous' But Mind spokesman Sophie Corlett said: "It is a preposterous suggestion that someone who has a mental health problem should be prepared to accept less than minimum wage to get their foot in the door with an employer.
"People with mental health problems should not be considered a source of cheap labour and should be paid appropriately for the jobs they do."
She said employers should be educated about mental health problems, adding that more than 50% of people with mental health problems lived on weekly household income of less than £200.
A Conservative Party spokesman told the BBC: "These comments do not reflect the views of the Conservative Party and do not reflect government policy".
Labour MP Dame Anne Begg, chairman of the work and pensions committee, said more needed to be done to remove the barriers facing disabled people in the workplace but the MP's arguments were "unfair and wrong".
"To say that all disabled people should be excluded from the coverage of the minimum wage ... would be discriminatory against disabled people. It would set the cause of equality for disabled people back sometime to the middle of the last century."

Article for June 21st

Apple to 'ban iPhone gig filming'

Ban ... Apple plans to stop iPhone users from being able to film during concerts like Take That's
Ban ... Apple plans to stop iPhone users from being able to film during concerts like Take That's


IPHONE users may soon be stopped from filming at concerts — as a result of new Apple technology.

The leading computer company plans to build a system that will sense when people are trying to video live events — and turn off their cameras.
A patent application filed by Apple revealed how the technology would work.
If an iPhone were held up and used to film during a concert infra-red sensors would detect it.
These sensors would then contact the iPhone and automatically disable its camera function.
People would still be able to send text messages and make calls.
The new technology is seen as an attempt to protect the interests of event organisers and broadcasters who have exclusive rights to concerts.
The companies are often left frustrated when videos of shows appear online via websites such as YouTube which let users watch them for free.
Apple filed for the patent 18 months ago — and it is thought if successful it will help them negotiate deals with record labels to sell content through iTunes.

Read more: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3641676/Apple-to-ban-iPhone-gig-filming.html#ixzz1PZCDjEKd