Friday 2 November 2012

Discussion article for November 6th


Plan for female quotas on EU company boards dealt blow

UK and others derail proposal as row breaks out over posting that would ensure all-male European Central Bank executive


EU plans to enforce a much higher profile for women in the European business elite have been thrown into disarray, with a Brussels commissioner being told to try again on legislation to compel female quotas on company boards.
The defeat for Viviane Reding, the commissioner for fundamental rights, came amid another row over sexism at the apex of the EU. Herman Van Rompuy, the European council president, pleaded with the parliament in Strasbourg to endorse the appointment of Yves Mersch (a man), from Luxembourg, to the executive board of theEuropean Central Bank (ECB).
Mersch's appointment, which looks inevitable despite being delayed by parliamentary opposition on grounds of gender, would make the six-strong ECB executive all male, and its governing council of 23 also exclusively male.
Reding has been pushing though new draft EU legislation insisting on 40%-female quotas for company boards across Europe, with stiff penalties for noncompliance. The proposals fell foul of British-led opposition among the EU member states, with at least 10 governments reluctant to impose quotas.
Those countries argued that the issue should not be legislated at EU level but rather left to national policy-making, and that policies already being pursued in member states to redress the gender imbalance should be given time to work.
But Reding's biggest immediate problem was a lack of consensus within the European commission on the contentious draft legislation. This split caused some to question why she was trying to force the issue, if she was unable to get it past this first hurdle. It is highly unusual for the commission to draft a law that will not pass muster among the 27 commissioners.
The dispute was not split along gender lines. Quite the contrary: on Monday, Reding said she had constructed a formidable coalition, with the support of five prominent male commissioners. But four leading female commissioners – from Britain, theNetherlandsSweden, and Denmark – opposed the proposals.
Reding said she refused to give up on the issue, and the topic would be returned to the commission next month.
The European parliament is to vote on Thursday on Mensch's appointment to the ECB, after the chamber's influential economic and monetary affairs committee rejected the German-style inflation hawk on Monday on gender grounds.
Van Rompuy told the parliament on Tuesday that female under-representation in top posts was "blatant", and that he was working to remedy it, but still believed Mersch should get the job.
Mersch's appointment would delay any real chance of redressing the total imbalance in the ECB executive until 2018.
Sharon Bowles, the Lib Dem MEP and economic committee chair who is running for governor of the Bank of England, said: "What we heard today is no different to all the promises on equality that have universally failed: we need more than just talk and promises. We are objecting to the EU's most powerful institution being run by only men for the next six years."

Existing examples

France, Spain, Belgium, Denmark and Italy have introduced quota laws, as have non-EU nations Iceland and Norway, which has had a quota system since 2006 that requires at least 40% of either sex on all listed company boards. Firms were given only two years to comply. The Spanish law, passed in 2007, obliges quoted firms with more than 250 employees to aim for a 40%-female minimum on their boards by 2015. France passed its law in 2011, forcing large companies to reserve at least 40 % of boardroom positions for women by 2017. It applies to 2,000 companies in France that are either listed, have more than 500 employees or revenues over €50m.

Discussion article for November 6th


Amsterdam tourist cannabis ban rejected by mayor


The mayor of Amsterdam says he will not ban foreign tourists from using the city's famous cannabis cafes, after months of argument over new drug laws.
The move comes after the new government of the Netherlands said it would be up to local authorities whether or not to impose such a ban.
Mayor Eberhard van der Laan said banning the sale of the drug to foreigners could lead to more crime.
Each year, some 1.5 million tourists visit Amsterdam to consume cannabis.
"The 1.5 million tourists will not say 'then no more marijuana', they will swarm all over the city looking for drugs," said Mayor Van der Laan, who has long opposed a ban.
"This would lead to more robberies, quarrels about fake drugs, and no control of the quality of drugs on the market - everything we have worked towards would be lost to misery."
Tourism fears
Amsterdam also relies heavily on tourism, and cannabis users make up about a third of its total visitors.
Under laws introduced by the previous conservative-led Dutch government, a national ban on foreigners using cannabis was due to be rolled out to Amsterdam by the end of this year.
It was intended to curb drug use and prevent drug dealers from operating in the Netherlands, and prevent them from buying drugs to sell abroad.
The move was strongly opposed by cafe owners, who said the law unfairly discriminated against other EU residents, and warned that 90% of their income came from foreign tourists.
There are an estimated 700 coffee shops selling cannabis in the Netherlands.
It is not strictly legal to use cannabis, but its use is tolerated and possession of small amounts was decriminalised in the 1970s.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-20165371

Discussion article for November 6th


Germany Discloses Most of the Spy Tools It's Using—and Other Countries Should, Too


Most law enforcement agencies refuse to reveal the surveillance technologies they use, claiming doing so could threaten national security. But authorities in Germany have shown it’s possible to be transparent without the sky falling in—by disclosing how they’ve spent millions on spy tools to help monitor Skype, email, and mobile phones.
Earlier this year, German politician Jan Korte submitted a series of written questions to the country’s federal ministry of home affairs regarding surveillance tools. The request was prompted by a scandal about how police had paid a private company to develop a controversial spy trojan to infiltrate and monitor suspects’ computers—a tactic that in most circumstances violates the German constitution. The answers Korte received were published in German in July, but have only this month been translated into English.
What the answers revealed is the technology used by some of the country’s federal agencies and the companies contracted to provide it. Between 2005 and 2011, for instance, the Federal Office of Administration, which carries out work for all of Germany’s federal ministries, spent more than €1.9 million ($2.5 million) on telecom and internet surveillance gear provided by the companies TU München and Syborg, plus €158,000 ($204,000) on facial recognition software from the firm Cognitec.
Some police and intelligence agencies declined to provide Korte with the requested information, claiming it was restricted or classified. But others did not show the same concern. Customs authorities, for one, released details about the sophisticated surveillance tools they purchased, including spending more than €100,000 ($130,000) on software to monitor Skype, Gmail, Hotmail, AIM, Yahoo Mail, and Bit Torrent. The customs authorities, tasked with tackling drug crime in Germany, also paid a company called Schönhofer €1.8 million ($2.3 million) for equipment such as “ICT vehicles” designed to help gather data from target areas using “signal interrogator” technology. They additionally splashed out €170,000 ($220,000) on a cellphone-tracking tactic described as “stealthping,” which involves sending a covert signal to a phone in order find out its nearest location tower to discover the whereabouts of a person.
Despite receiving scant media coverage outside Germany, the release of the information has some international significance. Amid sweeping proposals being made across several Western democracies, including the United States, surveillance has sparked concern about violations of civil liberties and privacy. Governments’ and law enforcement agencies’ reluctance to release any information about the technologies they are using to monitor people only to adds to the anxiety, occasionally leading to outright hysteria—and the lack of transparency also dampens the potential for informed debate.
Though some agencies in Germany refused to release information to Korte on national security grounds, that some opted instead for detailed, unredacted disclosure is as surprising as it is refreshing. Hopefully it will help show authorities in other countries that surveillance and secrecy do not always have to go hand in hand. But I won’t be holding my breath.